This case involves a sixty-five-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital for congestive heart failure. His presenting symptoms included progressive shortness of breath, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and lower extremity swelling. During the patient’s stay, a five-centimeter mass was found on the left posterior upper lung lobe, along with a collection of fluid along the right lung base that was consistent with a pleural effusion. The radiologist recommended a biopsy because the combination of findings was highly suspicious for malignancy. A CT-guided percutaneous biopsy was performed using a posterior approach, and it was conducted without incident. Shortly after the patient was transferred to the recovery area, however, he went into cardiopulmonary arrest. Because of this, ACLS protocols were initiated. A chest tube was placed and over 4000cc of dark red blood was evacuated. Three units of blood were transfused during the code but the patient did not survive.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Are the complications described in this summary likely the result of inadequate technique?
Expert Witness Response E-005926
There is no real evidence here to suggest that this complication was due to inadequate surgical technique. As with any surgical procedure, complications are possible. Fortunately, major complications due to thin needle aspiration biopsies are fairly uncommon, and when complications do occur, they are generally mild. Nonetheless, if the patient was not on anti-coagulants and the labs values were normal before the procedure then there are no real prior predictors of this rare complication. The medical management that took place once the complication was revealed, however, may be investigated further as this person should not have passed.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
