Physician’s Failure To Communicate Lab Results Leads To Delayed Cancer Treatment

This case involves an otherwise healthy 55-year-old male patient in New Mexico with a family history of prostate cancer on his paternal side who saw his primary care physician for a prostate cancer screening.

ByWendy Ketner, M.D.

|

Updated onApril 26, 2022

Physician’s Failure To Communicate Lab Results Leads To Delayed Cancer Treatment

The test was ordered but the results were never communicated to the patient. Because he never heard from the physician’s office, the patient assumed that the test had come back normal. The patient came back a year later for another screening and the results came back well above 4.0 ng/mL. It was later discovered that the patient’s original lab results were high enough to warrant a biopsy 12 months earlier. The physician’s office alleged that the results were never sent to their office. The patient’s health rapidly deteriorated and he was diagnosed with prostate cancer. The patient died within 19 months of receiving his diagnosis.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

What is the standard of care regarding documentation of lab orders ordered on a patient?

What is a doctor's duty to follow up on labs orders when they are not received?

What is the standard of care to report abnormal PSA results to patients?

What is the standard of care to advise a patient with an abnormal PSA on treatment options?

Expert Witness Response E-074812

inline imageMost primary care organizations now recommend against routine PSA testing. If a test is performed, it should only be after a discussion about potential harms and very few, if any, benefits. Abnormal test results of any kind should be communicated to a patient in a timely fashion. Any lab tests ordered that do not arrive in the office should be traced. Office procedures should be in place to ensure both occur. It is not an adequate defense to say that the lab test was not received in the office. I was an expert witness for a case in which the primary care doctor did not conduct PSA testing on a patient who was later diagnosed with prostate cancer. The problem for this doctor was that he ordered the PSA test in the first place and then did not act on the results. This error gave the appearance of having led to the patient's advanced prostate cancer while in truth, screening was unlikely to have affected this outcome and should not have been done, to begin with.

About the author

Wendy Ketner, M.D.

Wendy Ketner, M.D.

Dr. Wendy Ketner is a distinguished medical professional with a comprehensive background in surgery and medical research. Currently serving as the Senior Vice President of Medical Affairs at the Expert Institute, she plays a pivotal role in overseeing the organization's most important client relationships. Dr. Ketner's extensive surgical training was completed at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, where she gained hands-on experience in various general surgery procedures, including hernia repairs, cholecystectomies, appendectomies, mastectomies for breast cancer, breast reconstruction, surgical oncology, vascular surgery, and colorectal surgery. She also provided care in the surgical intensive care unit.

Her research interests have focused on post-mastectomy reconstruction and the surgical treatment of gastric cancer, including co-authoring a textbook chapter on the subject. Additionally, she has contributed to research on the percutaneous delivery of stem cells following myocardial infarction.

Dr. Ketner's educational background includes a Bachelor's degree from Yale University in Latin American Studies and a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) from SUNY Downstate College of Medicine. Moreover, she is a member of the Board of Advisors for Opollo Technologies, a fintech healthcare AI company, contributing her medical expertise to enhance healthcare technology solutions. Her role at Expert Institute involves leveraging her medical knowledge to provide insights into legal cases, underscoring her unique blend of medical and legal acumen.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.