Leading Breast Cancer Experts Discuss Delayed Surgical Intervention for Metastatic Carcinoma


Oncologic SurgeryThis case involves a middle-aged female who presented to a breast surgeon with an existing diagnosis of breast cancer. At the time of presentation, the physician recommended a treatment plan of chemotherapy followed by surgery. The patient was offered and agreed to total mastectomies of both breasts, to be undertaken after she completed chemotherapy. After the patient’s regimen of chemotherapy was completed, imaging reported an excellent result and the patient underwent surgery. Following the surgery, the Defendant physician informed the patient that a full biopsy would be done. The biopsy performed revealed metastatic carcinoma involving a number of lymph nodes. The Defendant told the Plaintiff that she did not need additional surgery, citing “recent literature” that claimed identical survival rates for patients who received only external beam radiation compared with those who received both surgery and radiation. Eventually, the patient received a second opinion and was told that she needed to have surgery immediately.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

  • 1. Do you routinely treat patients with the presentation described above?
  • 2. Could this patient's lymph nodes have been removed in a more timely manner rather than relying solely upon radiation therapy?
  • 3. Is it likely that the delay would impact this patients prognosis?

Expert Witness Response E-000029

The issues in this case are mostly controversial. A repeat axillary node biopsy after a sentinel node was questionable and should not have been done, but an axillary dissection should have been carried out, but accuracy of a biopsy in such situations is low to poor. The wait for the biopsy may have accounted for additional delay. Whether radiation should be used or axillary dissection is in a current clinical trial, so it is not known if the patient’s lymph nodes could have been removed in a more timely manner. There is an ongoing randomized trial that specifically addresses axillary management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with proven axillary node metastases. If the sentinel nodes remain positive after neaodjuvant chemo, Alliance A11202 randomly assigns patients to axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection with nodal radiotherapy for all patients. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy. This means that both options are clinically acceptable at this time.

Expert Witness Response E-000982

I frequently treat patients like this in my practice. Recent data suggests that as long as you can identify 3 or more sentinel nodes, the false negative rate is reasonable at about 10%, so it may be reasonable to attempt a sentinel node biosy. That being said, if the nodes are positive (either intraoperatively or post-operatively) then an ALND is still standard of care and could have been performed. The study that was quoted to the patient was based on patients who did not get neoadjuvant chemo (and also had negative nodes prior to the sentinel node).

RELATED EXPERT WITNESSES

Post Tags