Laundry Detergent Sold With Misleading Warnings

ByJoseph O'Neill

|

Updated onDecember 21, 2017

Laundry Detergent Sold With Misleading Warnings

This case takes place in Illinois and involves single use detergent pods. The pods in question are brightly colored and packaged in a way that resembles an edible item. Additionally, The liquid in the pods is under so much pressure that when bitten it is almost impossible for a child not to swallow the toxic contents. Instructions on the packaging recommend consuming fluids post ingestion, however, children who have consumed the pods developed a host of complications as a result of following these instructions. The warning label regarding accidental ingestion customers to drink water after accidental ingestion. The label does not warn customers that ingestion by a child is an emergency which could easily be fatal. Moreover, this instruction is particularly dangerous because drinking water will only exacerbate the ingestion of the chemicals, thereby worsening the injuries sustained.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Please explain why you're qualified to assess the safety / adequacy of the warnings and labeling utilized in this product.

2. Have you ever created warnings / labeling for similar products? If so, what additional safety measures must be considered?

Expert Witness Response E-028932

inline imageI have a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a focus on Human Factors, and I have designed and evaluated warnings in a variety of domains. I have evaluated warnings for products which involve hazardous substances and know that there are federal requirements for the labeling of hazardous substances that must be followed. To be effective, it is necessary that a warning be read, understood, and complied with, and also that compliance with the information provided in the warning reduces the likelihood and/or severity of harm. Upon review of the case overview, only, it appears that the instructions provided regarding what to do if the product is ingested provided information that failed to reduce the likelihood / severity of harm and, possibly, increased the likelihood / severity of harm.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe has extensive experience in online journalism and technical writing across a range of legal topics, including personal injury, meidcal malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, commercial litigation, and more. Joe spent close to six years working at Expert Institute, finishing up his role here as Director of Marketing. He has considerable knowledge across an array of legal topics pertaining to expert witnesses. Currently, Joe servces as Owner and Demand Generation Consultant at LightSail Consulting.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.