This case involves a fifty-two-year-old patient who underwent an L5- S1 discectomy and fusion procedure that was met with significant complications. The patient required a revision procedure two weeks after the original surgical intervention. It was determined that a screw was left behind at the L5 which caused foot drop and other neurological deficits that resulted in the patient no longer being able to walk without assistance.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. How could this situation have been avoided and what is the usual prognosis for this type of surgery?
Expert Witness Response E-000572
Outcome after fusion surgery is measured in terms of the three cardinal clinical manifestations of spinal instability: neurological function, pain, and disabling deformity. With overt instability (trauma, tumor, infection, etc.), neurological function after surgery is directly related to preoperative neurological status and cannot be used as a measure of success of fusion surgery. For instance, after a thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation with cord laceration and paraplegia, the success of fusion surgery should not be measured in terms of recovery of neurological function, but in terms of addressing disabling deformity and pain. The screw being left behind would definitely be a breach in care and the only way to prevent this is meticulous disection during the entire procedure to ensure no instruments or materials are left behind.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
