OSHA Expert Witness Comments on Workplace Accident

ByStephen Gomez, J.D.

|

Updated onJanuary 6, 2022

OSHA Expert Witness Comments on Workplace Accident

This case involves an injury to an installer who was working in a commercial building. The plaintiff worked on all of the duct work for an HVAC unit. He had been told by the supervising electrician of the commercial building (who was employed by the building’s management company) that the electricity had been turned off for the area he was working in. As he prepared to enter a duct to examine areas that needed repairs, he brushed up against a conduit. Subsequently, electricity entered his leg, ran across his back, and exited out of his arms. The plaintiff fell from his twelve-foot ladder and sustained a broken leg, a fractured spine, and a concussion.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. How safe is it to work near conduits, and what steps should be taken by supervisors to ensure that any area with conduits is made safe for workers like the plaintiff?

Expert Witness Response

inline imageTypically, workers can safely work near conduit as it should not be energized. Generally, if the commercial building is large enough, the repairman will be employed by the management company. Therefore, the management company (and affiliated parties, like the supervising electrician) are responsible for ensuring that adequate safety measures are taken. If the repairman was hired, then the general contractor would have the ultimate responsibility to assure the site was safe for all workers. Some of this responsibility could be delegated to other, managing contractor workers including union workers. The matter comes down to who created the hazard, who had the ability to control the hazard, who had the ability to correct the hazard, and who had employees exposed to a "known" hazard. In cases like this, communication is key. The supervisors need to clearly understand where the plaintiff should be working in order to guarantee that electricity is not on in the given area. Also, given the height that the plaintiff was working at, the plaintiff should have had some safety measures when examining and entering the duct.

About the author

Stephen Gomez

Stephen Gomez, J.D.

Stephen Gomez, J.D., is the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Lumos Labs, where he oversees legal and compliance matters in areas like privacy, intellectual property, and litigation. He has extensive legal experience in the e-commerce, media, and entertainment industries, previously holding key roles at Thirstie, Equinox Media, and SeatGeek. Gomez also contributed to legal functions at HelloFresh and Chubb and has a background in legal content and research management. He earned his J.D. from Boston University School of Law and a B.A. in Politics from New York University. His expertise lies in providing strategic legal advice to fast-growing companies.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.