This case involves a 26-year-old female patient who underwent a mastoidectomy as part of an endolymphatic sac decompression operation. The procedure was met with several complications including major damage to the facial nerve and a syndrome known as Synkinesis. The nerve injury and synkinesis have caused numbness around her mouth, a drooping eyelid, facial twitching, and hyper lacrimation.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
1. Was this surgery necessary or could some other means of intervention have been employed to more aptly avoid the complications?
Expert Witness Response E-005001
The first consideration is whether the patient's diagnosis merited the surgery. ELS decompression is only performed for Meniere's disease, there are studies that demonstrate a 70-80% success rate in the treatment of this condition so it is appropriate to perform. Facial nerve injury should have been mentioned as a risk of surgery. Secondly, during the surgery facial nerve monitoring should have been used, if not this is a breach of typical standard practice. Once a facial nerve injury was identified (if it was known at the time), the nerve should have been decompressed above and below the site of injury (if the nerve is intact) and steroids administered. If not known at the time of surgery, the patient should have been taken back to OR for decompression once facial nerve paralysis was detected. If the nerve was transected it should have been re-approximated or a cable graft placement could have been done as an alternative.
About the author
Michael Talve, CEO
Michael Talve stands at the forefront of legal innovation as the CEO and Managing Director of Expert Institute. Under his leadership, the Expert Institute has established itself as a vital player in the legal technology arena, revolutionizing how lawyers connect with world-class experts and access advanced legal technology. Michael's role involves not only steering the company's strategic direction but also ensuring the delivery of unparalleled intelligence and cutting-edge solutions to legal professionals. His work at Expert Institute has been instrumental in enhancing the capabilities of attorneys in case preparation and execution, making a significant impact on the legal industry's approach to expert consultation and technological integration. Michael's vision and execution have positioned the Expert Institute as a key facilitator in the intersection of law and technology.
