Homeowner Disputes Foreclosure, Cites Institutional Incompetence

ByJoseph O'Neill

|

Updated onOctober 10, 2017

Homeowner Disputes Foreclosure, Cites Institutional Incompetence

The plaintiff in this case is the owner of the property located in Montana where the plaintiff has lived with her family for many years. The defendant seeks to foreclose on the property allegedly without legitimate basis. It is alleged that the default that triggered the notice of the trustee’s sale and the sale date came as the result of defendant’s intentional misconduct or institutional incompetence. The plaintiff claims that she has paid her mortgage in full, and has submitted all the paperwork requested by defendant throughout the course of the loan repayment period. Plaintiff paid her mortgage in full every month until, for reasons that remain unexplained, the defendant refused to accept plaintiff’s payments. It is this refusal to accept plaintiff’s payments which placed plaintiff in the alleged default. The plaintiff and her family now face the prospect of losing their home to foreclosure.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Please explain your qualifications to review this case.

2. Are you familiar with the protocols major banks have in place to ensure transparency and proper documentation of all transactions with customers? Please explain

Expert Witness Response E-013466

inline imageThere is likely some piece of information missing. The problem with borrower cases is that they will say they made all of their payments in full and on time, but often when a full review is done, that was not the case. My initial questions would include the following: who was responsible for the escrows - i.e., hazard insurance and property taxes - and were they up to date? Were the borrower's payments returned to sender or were they put in a suspense account? Has a Qualified Written Request per RESPA section 6 been made to obtain all servicing records including origination documents, payment histories, and escrow account balances? Banks are not generally in the business of refusing payments made in full and on time, so unless the bank has made a rare and egregious error, the borrower is not disclosing everything.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe has extensive experience in online journalism and technical writing across a range of legal topics, including personal injury, meidcal malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, commercial litigation, and more. Joe spent close to six years working at Expert Institute, finishing up his role here as Director of Marketing. He has considerable knowledge across an array of legal topics pertaining to expert witnesses. Currently, Joe servces as Owner and Demand Generation Consultant at LightSail Consulting.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?