Fatal Cancer Goes Untreated Despite Suspicious CT Scan

ByJoseph O'Neill

|

Updated onOctober 14, 2017

Fatal Cancer Goes Untreated Despite Suspicious CT Scan

This case involves a female patient who presented to a Kentucky hospital ER with difficulty breathing. Her condition stabilized after she was placed on several medications, however the patient later developed severe abdominal pain. As part of the evaluation of her status, a CT scan of the abdomen was ordered. The CT scan showed a suspicious mass in the patient’s abdomen. The radiologist communicated this finding to the defendant doctor immediately, however the defendant did not initiate any follow up. After several months, the patient presented to the hospital with continuing abdominal pain. A CT scan of the abdomen performed at the ER revealed several urological problems. The pathology report revealed the presence of aggressive cancer, and the patient was admitted for surgery shortly thereafter. Chemotherapy was recommended and the patient was discharged home in stable condition. The patient later presented to the hospital with increasing pain. A CT scan revealed extensive metastases in one of the patient’s major organs. She was discharged home and treating physicians recommended palliative therapy. She died several weeks later.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Do you treat patients with the above presentation? If so, how often?

2. What is the standard follow up for a patient with a suspicious mass?

3. Could the cancerous bladder have been treated if it was confirmed at an earlier stage?

Expert Witness Response E-008939

inline imageI treat patients with this type of cancer on a daily basis. Eighty percent of my practice is oncology, and I constantly see patients who present with abnormal CT scans like the patient described in the case at hand. Standard follow-up for an undiagnosed mass would include timely referral to an urologist for cystoscopic evaluation as well as urine cytology. Delay in diagnosis of this type of cancer and delay in time to cystectomy have been studied and are associated with worse patient survival. It is possible that this cancer could have been treated if confirmed at an earlier stage. I would be happy to review this matter on behalf of the patient.

About the author

Joseph O'Neill

Joseph O'Neill

Joe has extensive experience in online journalism and technical writing across a range of legal topics, including personal injury, meidcal malpractice, mass torts, consumer litigation, commercial litigation, and more. Joe spent close to six years working at Expert Institute, finishing up his role here as Director of Marketing. He has considerable knowledge across an array of legal topics pertaining to expert witnesses. Currently, Joe servces as Owner and Demand Generation Consultant at LightSail Consulting.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?