Commercial Solar Panel Installation Leads To Workmanship Dispute

ByJohn Lomicky

|

Updated onApril 11, 2019

This case involves the unpaid construction of a solar panel facility in Washington state. The facility and its solar panel modules experienced damage due to a snowstorm several months after the construction of the commercial utility project began. After the facility was repaired, the facility elected not to pay the construction company in full due to alleged construction and workmanship issues. The construction company then sued the facility for lack of payment and the owner of the facility countersued regarding alleged workmanship issues. An expert in solar panels installation and tracker systems was sought to comment on the process, including transportation, delivery, handling, and installation.

Question(s) For Expert Witness

1. Please describe your experience with installing solar modules and tracker systems for commercial utility projects.

2. What is your experience in quality assurance or quality control on a large commercial site?

3. What materials would you need to determine potential issues with workmanship and to estimate costs for repairs?

Expert Witness Response E-266989

inline imageEvery tracker (manufacturer and version of product) has its own particulars, and it would require some industry research to determine the reasonable causes for whatever workmanship failures are alleged. My company maintains a roughly 40MW tracker and we have extensive in construction, construction management, estimating, maintenance and quality control of commercial and <30MW utility PV projects. We currently maintain and operate approximately 80MW of projects in one state. In order to estimate the cost of repairs I would require the specific equipment used and associated specs/manuals, pictures, a site visit, engineering drawings, the EPC contract, field reports, special inspections and the QC plan/logs. I have previously testified in a 3MW commercial rooftop case regarding a claim of wrongful termination of a GC for breach of contract on the basis of systemic workmanship, failure to properly manage critical path scheduling, and design change impacts.

About the author

John Lomicky

John Lomicky

John Lomicky is a J.D. candidate at FSU Law with a multidisciplinary background. He earned his Bachelor's degree in Neurobiology and Near Eastern Studies from Georgetown University and has graduate degrees in International Business and Eurasian Studies. John's professional experience includes working in private equity as an Associate at Kingfish Group and in legal business development and research roles at the Expert Institute. His expertise spans managing sales teams, company expansion, and providing consultative services to legal practices in various fields.

Find an expert witness near you

What State is your case in?

What party are you representing?

background image

Subscribe to our newsletter

Join our newsletter to stay up to date on legal news, insights and product updates from Expert Institute.