Anjelica Cappellino, J.D.
Anjelica Cappellino, Esq., a New York Law School alumna and psychology graduate from St. John’s University, is an accomplished attorney at Meringolo & Associates, P.C. She specializes in federal criminal defense and civil litigation, with significant experience in high-profile cases across New York’s Southern and Eastern Districts. Her notable work includes involvement in complex cases such as United States v. Joseph Merlino, related to racketeering, and U.S. v. Jimmy Cournoyer, concerning drug trafficking and criminal enterprise.
Ms. Cappellino has effectively represented clients in sentencing preparations, often achieving reduced sentences. She has also actively participated in federal civil litigation, showcasing her diverse legal skill set. Her co-authored article in the Albany Law Review on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines underscores her deep understanding of federal sentencing and its legal nuances. Cappellino's expertise in both trial and litigation marks her as a proficient attorney in federal criminal and civil law.
Pfizer Expands Chantix Recall Due to Potential Cancer Risks
Pfizer expanded its recall of smoking cessation treatment, Chantix for its high levels of N-nitroso-varenicline. The type of nitrosamines found in the drug is a known carcinogen.
Posted on September 9, 2021 in Featured & News
Pennsylvania Superior Court Redefines “Cause of Death” in Medical Malpractice Cases
Last year, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion that has caused waves within the medical and legal communities.
Posted on September 21, 2021 in Featured & News
NuVasive’s MAGEC Rod Complications Prompt FDA Warnings
It has been a hectic year for medical device company NuVasive and its MAGEC product line. This past July, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning concerning NuVasive’s Specialized Orthopedics’ MAGEC devices.
Posted on September 30, 2021 in Featured & Litigation Monitor & News
How to Properly Document Expert Witness Research
An expert's final opinion often culminates in a written report. Depending on the jurisdiction, the report has its own substantive requirements and disclosure rules.
Posted on October 6, 2021 in Featured & Resources for Experts
FDA Recalls Cordis Angiographic Catheters Over Danger of Dislodging
The Cordis Corporation recently issued a recall of its Super Torque MB Angiographic Catheter with Radiopaque Marker Bands products after receiving complaints of injuries. The marker bands can potentially move or dislodge during the procedure if the catheter is trapped between another device and the vessel wall.
Posted on October 19, 2021 in Featured & News
Ohio Heightens “Active Clinical Practice” Requirements for Medical Experts
Whether a physician or other medical provider is sufficiently qualified to testify as an expert is a multifaceted issue. Each state has its own requirements in determining whether a witness qualifies as an expert. Some jurisdictions require potential medical experts to engage in “active clinical practice” before rendering any opinions.
Posted on November 9, 2021 in Featured & Finding & Selecting Experts & News
Recent Developments in Defective 3M Earplug Litigation
The verdicts have been rolling in this week—with mixed results—concerning the mass tort actions filed against 3M. 3M is the manufacturer of allegedly defective military-issued earplugs that can cause hearing loss.
Posted on November 23, 2021 in Featured & Litigation Monitor & News
Bronx Apartment Fire Survivors File First Lawsuit
Two survivors of the deadly fire that ravaged a Bronx apartment building and claimed 17 victims have recently filed a lawsuit against the building's former and current owners.
Posted on January 25, 2022 in Featured & Litigation Monitor & News
Possible Causes for Destructive Colorado Fire Trigger Litigation Potential
The exact cause of a Colorado fire that ravaged over 6,000 acres of the state still remains unknown. The name, Marshall fire, references its proximity to the unincorporated community of Marshall.
Posted on February 22, 2022 in Featured & News
Amendments to Rule 702 Signal Change for Expert Testimony Admissibility
In the federal judicial system, Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is the governing rule of law for admissibility of expert witness testimony. Since its promulgation in 1975, the rule has undergone certain changes and amendments in response to case law development and interpretation of the admissibility standard.
Posted on June 16, 2022 in Featured & FRE, Daubert, & Frye & News & Resources for Experts & Working with Experts